<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mr. Kong's New Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kongwen.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Conspicuous Cultural Consumption with Mr. K!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress Suckage by Tijuana</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/wordpress-suckage/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Tijuana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-94</guid>
		<description>seriously</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress Suckage by Tijuana</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/wordpress-suckage/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Tijuana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-93</guid>
		<description>i just deleted my wordpress for pissing me off
T.T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just deleted my wordpress for pissing me off<br />
T.T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complete: Professor Layton by tijuana</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/complete-professor-layton/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>tijuana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-92</guid>
		<description>i love this game, but it&#039;s soo hard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love this game, but it&#8217;s soo hard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Dark Knight by Hugh</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/the-dark-knight/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Gosh darn it, I can&#039;t seem to write a freekin&#039; response without typos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh darn it, I can&#8217;t seem to write a freekin&#8217; response without typos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Dark Knight by Hugh</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/the-dark-knight/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Nice review Mr Kong.

The best line, of many, sums up the movie, &quot;sublimely&quot; indeed. Joker to Batman, who&#039;s incapable of murder: &quot;this is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object&quot; (I quote from memory).

The strength of Ledger&#039;s Joker is that he&#039;s &quot;no, ... not crazy,&quot; (or did he say “mad”?) as he insists in one of his few insistent moments. He just recognizes that good and evil are two side (two faces??) of human devise, not unlike the binaries that bind Batman/Bruce. And how fun it is to play with such fictions - how eerie too, as his convincing, yet contradictory, scar explanations evince. The card up the Joker&#039;s sleeve is a universe that&#039;s indifferent to morality and other forms of imposed order. He is “evil” because he interprets meaninglessness of the term absolutely; he is immovable to human solidarity, not to mention his own meta-madness. 

The strength of Batman&#039;s character is that has the same postmodern recognition as the Joker, yet for the “good” of Gotham, and yes the world, he relies on a very Platonist position: lie. Nietzsche said we have art because the truth is unbearable. The human mind needs fictions, imposed order, to orient itself in a disorienting, chaotic universe. Batman is good because he affirms humanity in the face of its meaninglessness. Like Candid, he&#039;s drive for life is unstoppable. 

This aesthetic perspective, to which I subscribe, nevertheless supports a dubious form of politics. Aesthetically sound – and some quirks aside, like that dumb Kumbaya scene on the boats - the film is essentially a validation of the Bush years and a blatant endorsement for the McCain campaign. How does Batman track the Joker&#039;s movements? He has an ethically-torn Freeman tap into cellphone conversations. Ring a bell? Though the Bush administration would have loved a White Knight for their war in Iraq, the idea of lying to the public for their own good is very Republican.  

Thus, the &quot;good&quot; Batman is perhaps &quot;evil&quot; beyond his fictional context. He constant surveillance actually calls humanity into doubt, the assumption being we’d all become like Joker if only we really knew the truth. 

Or do we, like the pathetic citizens of Gotham, (real)ly need him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review Mr Kong.</p>
<p>The best line, of many, sums up the movie, &#8220;sublimely&#8221; indeed. Joker to Batman, who&#8217;s incapable of murder: &#8220;this is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object&#8221; (I quote from memory).</p>
<p>The strength of Ledger&#8217;s Joker is that he&#8217;s &#8220;no, &#8230; not crazy,&#8221; (or did he say “mad”?) as he insists in one of his few insistent moments. He just recognizes that good and evil are two side (two faces??) of human devise, not unlike the binaries that bind Batman/Bruce. And how fun it is to play with such fictions &#8211; how eerie too, as his convincing, yet contradictory, scar explanations evince. The card up the Joker&#8217;s sleeve is a universe that&#8217;s indifferent to morality and other forms of imposed order. He is “evil” because he interprets meaninglessness of the term absolutely; he is immovable to human solidarity, not to mention his own meta-madness. </p>
<p>The strength of Batman&#8217;s character is that has the same postmodern recognition as the Joker, yet for the “good” of Gotham, and yes the world, he relies on a very Platonist position: lie. Nietzsche said we have art because the truth is unbearable. The human mind needs fictions, imposed order, to orient itself in a disorienting, chaotic universe. Batman is good because he affirms humanity in the face of its meaninglessness. Like Candid, he&#8217;s drive for life is unstoppable. </p>
<p>This aesthetic perspective, to which I subscribe, nevertheless supports a dubious form of politics. Aesthetically sound – and some quirks aside, like that dumb Kumbaya scene on the boats &#8211; the film is essentially a validation of the Bush years and a blatant endorsement for the McCain campaign. How does Batman track the Joker&#8217;s movements? He has an ethically-torn Freeman tap into cellphone conversations. Ring a bell? Though the Bush administration would have loved a White Knight for their war in Iraq, the idea of lying to the public for their own good is very Republican.  </p>
<p>Thus, the &#8220;good&#8221; Batman is perhaps &#8220;evil&#8221; beyond his fictional context. He constant surveillance actually calls humanity into doubt, the assumption being we’d all become like Joker if only we really knew the truth. </p>
<p>Or do we, like the pathetic citizens of Gotham, (real)ly need him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress Suckage by JoshMiller</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/wordpress-suckage/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshMiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Wordpress definitely did something odd with Categories at some point.  When I moved my personal blog to my own install of wordpress, my categories lost all of their names.  They are all blanks.

On Lameazoid (hosted on Wordpress.com), the Categories box has been named &quot;A&quot; got a while.  I tried correcting it but it didn&#039;t take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress definitely did something odd with Categories at some point.  When I moved my personal blog to my own install of wordpress, my categories lost all of their names.  They are all blanks.</p>
<p>On Lameazoid (hosted on WordPress.com), the Categories box has been named &#8220;A&#8221; got a while.  I tried correcting it but it didn&#8217;t take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Gig in the Sky by Rob Cypher</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/the-great-gig-in-the-sky/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Cypher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=110#comment-87</guid>
		<description>what up agffer....that was a touching eulogy you wrote. too bad I HATE pink floyd. what up doe stay up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what up agffer&#8230;.that was a touching eulogy you wrote. too bad I HATE pink floyd. what up doe stay up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acquired: Final Fantasy IV by Kong</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/acquired-final-fantasy-iv/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Kong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=72#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think this remake does the game sufficient justice. I&#039;m annoyed that they made Kain and Palom right-handed... but if that&#039;s my biggest complaint right now, that&#039;s saying something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think this remake does the game sufficient justice. I&#8217;m annoyed that they made Kain and Palom right-handed&#8230; but if that&#8217;s my biggest complaint right now, that&#8217;s saying something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acquired: Final Fantasy IV by pdRydia</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/acquired-final-fantasy-iv/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>pdRydia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=72#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I [heart] this game so much.

I&#039;m playing it right now, as a matter of fact. I&#039;m on my New Game+, near the end of the game and leveling/farming for epics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I [heart] this game so much.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m playing it right now, as a matter of fact. I&#8217;m on my New Game+, near the end of the game and leveling/farming for epics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complete: Professor Layton by Kong</title>
		<link>http://kongwen.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/complete-professor-layton/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Kong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongwen.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Yep, this was enjoyable enough that I&#039;d get the sequel for sure. My only worry would be that they keep using the same kind of puzzles just with different configurations.  But that&#039;s OK, I suppose, if the mystery/storyline part is good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, this was enjoyable enough that I&#8217;d get the sequel for sure. My only worry would be that they keep using the same kind of puzzles just with different configurations.  But that&#8217;s OK, I suppose, if the mystery/storyline part is good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
